| From : | Duffner, Heinrich <Heinrich.Duffner@gopa.de> |
| To : | Lika Klimiashvili <lklimiashvili@moh.gov.ge>; Tamar Barkalaia <tbarkalaia@moh.gov.ge>; Nino Veltauri <nveltauri@moh.gov.ge> |
| Subject : | Re: BS Indicator 2.3 - estimate |
| Cc : | KOCHISHVILI Nika (EEAS-TBILISI) <Nino.KOCHISHVILI@eeas.europa.eu>; JUODSNUKYTE Jurate (EEAS-TBILISI) <Jurate.JUODSNUKYTE@eeas.europa.eu>; Handley, David <David.Handley@gopa.de>; Diakonidze, Ana <Ana.Diakonidze@gopa.de> |
| Received On : | 24.06.2020 10:02 |
Dear Lika,
David just told me that the EU Delegation has not yet received the proposal on the Indicator 2.3. Could you be so kind as to send them the formulation you agreed to in your mail from Friday as the official proposal by the Ministry? Please let me know if you need some additional support in finalising this issue.
Best regards,
Heinrich
Dear Heinrich,
Thank you for suggesting stylistic changes in the formulation.
To clarify, when formulating the indicators we meant clients actually served by SESA but if beneficiaries somehow mean all the persons registered in Worknet, person not willing to get services and job, than we would accept your suggestions to change the formulation. Considering your suggestions the indicator will be the following:
Full achievement: Implementation of the full set of employment services as determined by the NSM in Tbilisi and all Regional Offices. At least 35% of the clients actually served by each regional office of SESA, except Tbilisi, come from the remote areas/municipalities without SESA office.
Partial achievement: Implementation of the full set of employment services as determined by the NSM in Tbilisi and six Regional Offices. At least 35% of the clients actually served by 6 regional offices of SESA, except Tbilisi, come from the remote areas/municipalities without SESA office.
Thank you!
Regards,
Lika
From: Duffner, Heinrich
Sent: 19 June, 2020 14:20
To: Lika Klimiashvili
Cc: Handley, David
Subject: Re: BS Indicator 2.3 - estimate
Dear Lika,
as mentioned in my previous mail, I made some -admittedly crude - calculations regarding the workload implied by the Indicator. We could make more precise calculations with the data from the WorkNet and, maybe, with the assumption on the time required per client, but I don't think the result would be very much different. I would therefore strongly suggest to take the number of clients actually served by the SESA offices as the basis for calculation of the 35%, and not the number of beneficiaries in the remote municipalities and regions.
Best regards,
Heinrich
From: Duffner, Heinrich
Sent: 19 June 2020 06:50
To: Lika Klimiashvili; Tamar Barkalaia;
nveltauri@moh.gov.ge
Cc: Handley, David; Diakonidze, Ana
Subject: BS Indicator 2.3 - further explanation
Dear Lika,
I want to come back to my proposed ‘stylistic’ change in the formulation of the indicator: At least 35% of the beneficiaries of each regional office, except Tbilisi, come from the remote areas/municipalities without SESA offices. If we calculate the persons receiving services in accordance with the NSM as the beneficiaries (clients) of the regional office and take them as the basis for the calculation, then we have a number that can be easily controlled by the SESA. On the other hand, 35% of the beneficiaries from the remote areas/municipalities could be quite a big number if beneficiaries means recipients of TSA registered as jobseekers on the WorkNet. This number would also include those persons who are not able to work (or maybe don’t want to). Moreover, since the regional office has no possibility to force them to show up and claim its services, it could become difficult to comply with the Indicator.
To get a better picture on the distribution of beneficiaries it would be useful to have information on the number of TSA recipients in the regions and the locations of the regional offices. If the relation between the population of the municipality with the regional office and the remaining area can be taken as a guide for an estimation, then we could expect that between 70 and 90% of TSA recipients of a region come from remote areas/municipalities. (Adjara with some 52% of the population living outside Batumi is an exception.) I will do some calculations also related to the regional labour force and unemployed during this morning and send them to you. But it would be best to have the figures of TSA recipients according to regions and locations of the regional offices.
I’m not sure how much time we will have to make a final proposal to the EU Delegation, but with the statistics on ‘jobseekers’ according to the WorkNet we could hammer out a well-founded proposal over the weekend. Please let me know what you think about this.
Best regards,
Heinrich
The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attachments, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail, and delete the original message.